The response to the announcement of our Building Pathways to Empowerment campaign has been so reinforcing.  The offers of help, both personal and financial, are tremendous.  Families and self-advocates have called and their excitement is contagious!  

A parent who serves on our board shared with me that it is so important for us to get the message out that we are not simply trying to survive this crisis -  we are finding and working towards new ways to thrive

A mother shared with me that she certainly could do with less and would be glad to - but wants to make sure there is less bureaucracy in the system as well.  

Provider response is also positive - providers are ready for change.  At a meeting of  the Indiana Conference of Executive Directors of Arcs, (ICEArc) Directors said that they clearly see the need for change and the value of redefining outcomes to focus on relationships and happiness.  They also see the need to not wait for the state to begin saving money.  One of our chapters has identified that just within their agency over $4 million dollars a year of savings can be made.   

In an interview with a Fort Wayne newspaper yesterday I laid out critical areas where savings can be captured - housemates, sensible approaches to serving people with high costs, and administrative reform to reduce bureaucracy.  We will link you to this article when it runs in the Fort Wayne paper. 

Our goal is get the word out to the general public through at least 100 interviews with newspapers, radio, and television between now and November.  Sally Morris, The Arc’s Assistant Director of Public Relations, is coordinating a new effort with communication staff at our local Arcs.  If you have ideas or want to help, please contact Sally at smorris@arcind.org. Mark Kevitt, The Arc’s Director of Program Services, is serving as our “Campaign Manager.”  Please contact Mark with any ideas or offers to help at mkevitt@arcind.org.

Building pathways to Empowerment

While listening to a news show this morning I had the chance to listen to someone I consider one of the really smart people in the world dealing with our economy, Thomas Freidman, of the New York Times.  He was saying that whether or not health care reform passes, this is the last chance for a very long time for the American people to get a new slice of the pie.  After this debate is over, virtually everything we do is all about building a bigger pie tin that builds our economy.

I think he is absolutely right, and it is something that is at the center of the new effort launched today by The Arc of Indiana.

This economy and the resulting impact it is having on education/special education, health care and programs for people with disabilities, is at a critical crossroads.   We can rail against the cuts and play defense and work to lessen the cuts - which might be successful to a degree - but in the end we are fighting a losing battle and in many ways abandoning people waiting for services who are desperate. 

The Arc is starting out on a new path, one that starts from the premise that we can reinvent what it is we want as a product and what it is that addresses the new realities of today’s economy, while also focusing on the essential and fundamental values of personal choice, individual empowerment and seeking meaningful relationships. Indiana’s service system for adults spends $1 Billion dollars a year - much of it for things people do not feel add value and fall into the category of bureaucracy and paperwork.  We need to streamline, remove barriers and needless buearucracy and allow people to get back to what is best for people.

This change will need to involve what consumers - families and self-advocates- want and need, providers in what they provide, and government in how they deliver, pay for and administer these services.

It is a critical time for Indiana. Perhaps no other time in my career has been so challenging.  But in talking with families, self-advocates and providers in recent weeks, this also can be liberating.  We have always been the visionarys who sought a better way, there is no more better time to do that again than right now, and if not us, who. 

We hope you will join with us. Keep informed through all the electronic ways available on our website.  Join us at meetings we will be organizing around the state. Watch and listen to us on radio shows and television news programs. Read about this campaign in local newspapers.  We will be reaching out and speaking everywhere we can to share this new message.  Thank you for all you do every day.  We look forward to you joining us on this new pathway.

Did the federal stimulus work?  One can only wonder how people in Indiana would have been impacted had we not had the stimulus program to avoid massive cuts in education and Medicaid.  An article in the February 18th issue of the Indianapolis Star on this topic mentions only briefly that stimulus funds kept teachers employed and provided Medicaid health benefits.  Indiana expects to receive a total of $1.4 billion in Medicaid stimulus funding, not $1.4 million as reported in an early edition of the Star.  These funds are critical to the lives of Hoosiers who are elderly or disabled, as well as to the staff that serve them. 

Home care for people with disabilities and seniors is a key example.  Stimulus funds provided an increase in the federal contribution to Indiana’s Medicaid program, allowing thousands of vulnerable Hoosiers to receive the supports they need to live in their homes. The people who serve them continued to receive a paycheck, pay taxes, support their families and not end up on Medicaid and/or unemployment themselves.

It is quite amazing that politics continues to be played on the stimulus and other critical issues, rather than all sides pulling together to work to address the tremendous problems facing our state and country. 

The Arc of Indiana is committed to finding better and smarter ways to utilize federal and state funds that are so important to the people we represent.  We understand that we must all work together to develop new approaches that use tax dollars in the most effective way and direct help to those most in need.   We have been working for several months in partnership with leaders of provider agencies to push for the implementation of real reforms that can save significant funds and allow people to continue to receive vital services.  Without the federal stimulus dollars, we would be in a far different position - scrabbling to react to cuts in funding and services beyond those that have occurred, rather than working towards more innovative approaches to using scarce resources.     

While it is fair to ask if the stimulus worked, political noise should not be allowed to drown out reasonable voices that seek to rebuild our economy while at the same time take care of vulnerable citizens.

One of the great criticisms on the “war on terror” is that we are always planning to stop the last attack  from happening again.  It may be a truism for more than the war on terror.

As the state, advocates, providers and consumers look to use existing funds more efficiently, control costs, redirect resources and, at the same time, work to meet the ever increasing needs of people - we too may be guilty of “stopping the last attack” instead of thinking ahead.

This week the topic of federal deficits is capturing attention, including the possibility of creating a new federal deficit commission. Key to any discussions such a commission has will be the topic of entitlements. We can be certain that they will not be looking to expand entitlements, which consume the overwhelming portion of federal resources, but rather, will likely focus on how such entitlements can be reduced.  Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid are the big three, all of which people with disabilities depend on.

Much has been written about the tea-bagger movement - some praising it and some ridiculing it for the fringe elements involved.  But it may be missed by many that people in the middle are fed up with business as usual and “spending that is out of control.”  People are worried about deficits and what that means for them and their children.  

What brings me to this point?  This week I will spend hours on behalf of people with developmental disabilities and their families working with FSSA on how Medicaid is used to fund very important services through Medicaid Waivers.  Many times I feel the argument is over nickels and dimes. For example, there is currently a great deal of discussion on spending on supported employment, even though it represents only 3/10ths of one percent of the state’s Medicaid Waiver budget.  At the same time, there is little focus on residential services which consumes 90 percent of the budget - using a model developed 20 years ago.  That model depends on a work force of direct support professionals - people who are expected to provide support and care to vulnerable people while adhering to strict compliance to regulations, yet who make so little, many at $8.75 an hour, that they often qualify for food stamps. 

This week I will also take part in a national call to help design a national campaign to end waiting lists throughout the country.  Such an effort will take tremendous resources - particularly if states keep following existing models and systems for providing services.   

Last week, State Senator Luke Kenley told us that to get through these times it will take sacrifice.  He is right, but I do not think he sees sacrifice in the same way I do.

Too often the discussion of sacrifice and entitlements comes back to support for cutting “your” entitlement, but not “mine.”  That thinking will not help anybody. 

We all must work together to get through these difficult economic and political times.  Sacrifice will mean rethinking what we can and must do, breaking old molds and expectations and more wisely investing through the taxes we all pay.

It will not be easy and it will not happen unless politicians begin working together - working not simply to win the next election, but working together for all the people of this country.  

I don’t have much in common with the teabagger crowd, and I am not even sure if the people The Arc represents would be welcome at their rallies.  But I do know that if we do not start really working together, rather than fighting with each other, we will all lose.

Last week The Arc of Indiana testified against a proposal to discontinue First Steps services to infants and toddlers with disabilities if their parents have fallen behind on making co-payments for services.   Today, a good friend and strong advocate for people with disabilities asked “Shouldn’t people pay something for First Steps services if they can afford it?”  Seems to make sense, or does it?

The Arc of Indiana has always recognized personal responsibility.  As a family-based organization we know firsthand that Hoosier families who have a loved one with a disability willingly and lovingly take on the responsibility of providing and caring for their family members.    In fact, the overwhelming majority of families are the only caregiver for their son or daughter and receive no services from the state system.  Study after study documents the unseen, extra costs families incur in providing for a child with a disability. Yes, we recognize personal responsibility and know families contribute in ways no government agency will ever understand or appreciate.

So why are co-pays for First Steps services an important a topic?  There are just two reasons for co-pays.  The first is the belief that families “who can afford it” should pay some amount of the overall cost of services their infant or toddler with a disability receives.  Co-payments can range from $24 a month to $960 a month, depending on the income of the family.  However, a bill now moving through the Indiana General Assembly SB 35 would remove the maximum amount a family must make in co-payments.  If SB 35 passes, those amounts will increase.   

Co-payments currently generate, we are told, $1 million a year for a program that spends over $50 million.  Once you deduct the cost of collecting that - and people argue about the true cost - perhaps somewhere between $900,000 dollars to $0 is actually generated - if you consider the cost of staff time to calculate what a family’s co-pay should be, billing, processing payments, rebilling (often because a family is waiting for insurance payments), etc. etc.  Economically, it makes little sense; but we lost this argument long ago to people who felt, “Families should pay!”

The second reason for co-pays is more subtle.  The co-pay forces families to decide whether or not they can afford for their child to receive a service or services.  Higher co-pays lead families to say “no” to a service their child may very much need.

The New England Journal of Medicine published a study recently that showed a dramatic reduction in Medicare doctor visits when co-pays were raised.  The study also documented this led to more hospitalizations and higher, not lower, costs.

We believe the same is true for First Steps. Requiring families to make co-payments may limit the critical services that will have life-long cost implications for children.  It may make some feel virtuous today for “saving money” but the cost tomorrow in human and economic costs are staggering.

The Arc of Indiana asked the Indiana Family and Social Services Administration for data on the current co-pay proposal.  You can find their answers at: http://www.arcind.org/news/?naid=31

We will continue to raise this issue - we hope you will join us.

A second public hearing for proposed revisions to the First Steps, Early Intervention Program, will take place on Monday, February 15th at 3:00 p.m. in the Indiana Government Center South Auditorium.   We encourage anyone interested in the First Steps Program to come and participate in the Public Hearing.  Families who have gone through First Steps and have stories to share about billing problems or concerns, insurance issues, etc, should come and discuss their experience.  Families should also share the positive results that First Steps has had on their child’s life.  Children experiencing developmental delays should not fall victim to the state’s financial crisis.  Other alternatives for collecting the delinquent co-pays need to be explored.

I am very pleased to introduce an exciting new voice to our movement, Michelle Fisher. 

Michelle is the host of “A View from My Window,” an audio cast that is now a regular feature on The Arc of Indiana web site. 

Michelle is a talented young woman who does not let her disability define her, while at the same time accepting it as part of her - just like her sparkling personality. 

Michelle’s show will feature interviews and discussions with self-advocates, families, professionals, and policy makers.  We hope you will find this ongoing dialogue interesting, informative, engaging and sometimes just fun.   

I think you will find that this will be something you want to listen to regularly. 

Thanks, Michelle, for making The Arc part of your life, and for sharing your perspective - that unique view from your window - with our listeners.

'

The Arc of Indiana appreciates the difficulty of quantifying how many jobs have been saved or created by federal stimulus dollars.  Governor Daniels and Representative Pat Bauer are correct in being cautious to not overstate the impact.  However, while it may be difficult to statistically measure the impact, the positive results of federal stimulus dollars that have gone to stabilize Indiana’s Medicaid program can been seen each and every day.  

Medicaid provides health care to people with disabilities, supports to families caring for loved ones at home and supports to adults with disabilities that allow them to live in their own home.  Medicaid also funds care to people who are elderly or disabled in nursing homes. 

Statistics do not tell the story of the little girl who continues to receive the home nursing care she needs to live at home with Mom and Dad, the young man with Down syndrome and his roommate with cerebral palsy who continue to have support staff that allows them to live in an apartment, or the caregiver who got a paycheck on Friday and will make this month’s mortgage payment.   Read the rest of this entry »